Text
(Skripsi) ANALYSIS OF CROSS-EXAMINATION QUESTIONING IN PRIMAL FEAR MOVIE
This study aims to explain the types of courtroom questions used byrnlawyers, types of responses used by witnesses or accused, and the correlationrnbetween the questions and answers from both perspectives. The subject of thernresearch is the dialogue in the cross-examination in Primal Fear Movie. Thernresearch used descriptive qualitative method. The main theory of this research isrnthe courtroom questions of Gibbons (2008) and the Cooperative Principle byrnGrice (1975). The result of the research shows that courtroom questionsrnDeclaratives used 8 times (26,7%), Tag Questions 4 times (13,3%), Polar Yes-NornQuestions 12 times (40%), WH-Questions 4 times (13,3%), Projection Questionsrn2 times (6,7%). The use of courtroom questions can express several functions:rnasking for confirmation, seeking agreement, asking to supply truth value, orrncalling for elaboration. The results of the analysis of the relationship betweenrnanswers and questions based on the Cooperative Principles. Out of the 30rnquestions, 16 answers are answered in a manner cooperative by witnesses orrnaccused. At the same time, 14 answers indicated that the witness and accusedrnviolating the provisions contained in the cooperation principle
Tidak tersedia versi lain